Back to blog
Research9 min

Geo routing vs. one-size-fits-all: a 3-market experiment

We ran the same campaign with and without geo routing across India, the US, and Germany. The results weren't even close — localized routing delivered 3.2x higher conversion rates.

getowl Team·Data & Research
May 18, 2026

We partnered with a mid-size SaaS company to run a controlled experiment across three markets: India, the United States, and Germany.

The test was simple: for the same product campaign, we created two links:

  • Link A — Single destination for all visitors (English, USD pricing)
  • Link B — Geo-routed to localized pages (local language, local currency)

Both links were shared equally across email, social, and paid channels in each market.

The Results

MarketLink A (Generic)Link B (Geo-Routed)Improvement
India1.2% conversion4.1% conversion+242%
USA2.8% conversion3.4% conversion+21%
Germany0.9% conversion3.1% conversion+244%
Overall1.6%3.5%+119%

The geo-routed link delivered 3.2x higher conversion rates in India and Germany, and a meaningful 21% lift even in the US (where the default page was already in English).

Why the US Still Improved

Even for English-speaking US visitors, the geo-routed page showed USD pricing upfront, used US-specific social proof (customer logos, testimonials), and loaded from a US-based CDN edge. These small differences compounded into a 21% lift.

Key Takeaways

  1. Non-English markets see the biggest gains — India and Germany saw 240%+ improvement
  2. Currency matters as much as language — Showing local pricing reduced friction significantly
  3. Even "same language" markets benefit — US-specific content beat generic English content by 21%
  4. Setup time is minimal — The geo routing rules took 5 minutes to configure in getowl
geo-routingresearchexperimentconversion-rateslocalization